Vyzora Lens

Methodology

How our editorial framework — wave model, conviction grades, and signal classifications — is derived, applied, and refined. Read this before drawing conclusions from anything in the dashboard.

Last refreshed: April 19, 2026 · Version 1.0
Important: this is editorial opinion, not investment advice. Every framework described below produces editorial research only. Vyzora is not a registered investment advisor. The outputs are not recommendations to buy or sell any security. Past performance shown anywhere in the Service is historical and may reflect selection bias. Consult a licensed financial professional before acting on any content.

1. Editorial focus

Vyzora Lens covers the publicly listed companies powering the artificial-intelligence value chain — from semiconductors, memory, and optical networking through power infrastructure, robotics, monetizers, and quantum. We focus on this universe because it is the largest capital-formation cycle of the 2020s and because it is poorly understood by mainstream sell-side research.

We do not cover: private companies, crypto assets, FX pairs, sports outcomes, or any non-equity asset class.

2. Universe of coverage

Our active universe is approximately 110 publicly traded names across 12 AI sectors. Names enter the universe when they (a) generate or are projected to generate at least 25% of revenue from AI-related demand within 24 months, and (b) have sufficient public disclosure to evaluate. Names exit when they no longer meet (a) or when corporate actions remove them from public listings.

Sector taxonomy:

  1. Compute & Accelerators (GPUs, custom ASICs)
  2. Memory & Storage (HBM, CXL, NAND)
  3. Networking & Photonics (transceivers, switches, CPO)
  4. Foundry & Equipment (wafer fabs, lithography, EDA)
  5. Energy, Nuclear & Gas (power for data centers)
  6. Power & Cooling Infrastructure (transformers, liquid cooling)
  7. Sovereign AI / Data Centers (national infrastructure plays)
  8. Robotics & Physical AI (cobots, autonomy, humanoids)
  9. AI Monetizers (ad-tech, enterprise SaaS earning AI revenue today)
  10. Software & Tooling (platforms, MLOps, data pipelines)
  11. Quantum Computing (call-option-style exposure)
  12. Adjacent Beneficiaries (industrial enablers)

3. The wave model

We organize the AI capex cycle into eight named investment waves. Each wave reflects a structural bottleneck in the value chain that, in our view, will or has shifted alpha to a different cluster of names. Waves are not predictions about price — they are capital-flow narratives that we use to organize coverage.

Wave 1
GPUs
2023–24 · Done
Wave 2
Memory
2024–25 · Maturing
Wave 3
Power
2025–26 · Active
Wave 4
Optics
2026–27 · Active
Wave 5
Robotics
2027–28 · Loading
Wave 6
CXL Memory
2027–28 · Loading
Wave 7
Monetizers
2026–27 · Active
Wave 8
Quantum
2028–30 · Speculative

Wave assignment is editorial — it reflects our reading of supply-chain data, capex commitments, and management commentary, not a quantitative model. Reasonable analysts will disagree on timing.

4. Conviction grade scale

Every theme and selected name in our coverage carries a conviction grade reflecting our editorial confidence in the underlying thesis, not a price target. Grades reflect (a) clarity of the bottleneck, (b) competitive moat, (c) management track record, (d) optionality, and (e) downside containment.

A
High conviction
Multiple independent data points support a clear, durable bottleneck. We believe the thesis is well-formed.
B
Above-average
Thesis is sound; one or two key inputs require additional confirmation in the next 1–2 quarters.
C
Tracking
Theme is interesting but evidence is incomplete. We are tracking it, not advocating it.
D
Skeptical
Visible interest but with structural concerns we cannot resolve from current disclosures.
F
Avoid (editorial)
In our editorial view, the risk/reward is unfavorable at present prices.
A conviction grade is not a recommendation, a rating, or a price target. It is an editorial label intended to help readers compare our level of confidence across multiple themes within the dashboard.

5. Signal classification

The Performance leaderboard tags each tracked name with one of four signal labels. These describe our editorial focus on the name within our framework — not a recommendation to transact:

SignalEditorial meaning
FOCUSName receives the most editorial attention in the current period; thesis is fully developed and actively monitored for catalysts.
TRACKName is in our active universe with meaningful coverage but is not the primary editorial focus this period.
MONITORName is on our watch list pending additional data; coverage is light until inflection points emerge.
SPECULATIVEName is in a speculative wave (e.g., quantum); should not be considered with the same weighting as core themes.

6. Performance disclosure

Where we cite year-to-date or cumulative performance figures (for example, on the Performance leaderboard or within wave-card commentary), the figures reflect the price return of the named security over the stated period, sourced from public market data feeds.

Important caveats on performance figures.

7. Sources and inputs

Our research draws on:

8. Update cadence

Our intent is a regular publication rhythm:

All published versions are date-stamped within the dashboard.

9. Conflicts of interest

Authors and affiliates of Vyzora may from time to time hold long or short positions in securities discussed in the Service. Where applicable, per-ticker holdings disclosure will accompany the relevant theme page. We do not accept payment from any company, broker, or other third party in exchange for coverage of specific securities, favorable framing, or any change to our editorial process.

10. Limitations and what we do not do

11. Changes to this methodology

We may revise this methodology as our framework evolves. Material changes will be reflected by an updated version number above and noted on the dashboard. Prior versions are not retained publicly but are available on request to research@vyzora.ai.